DEAR DR. BLONZ: I am inquiring about placebos in research and how they work. I am also interested in whether the placebo effect can affect food sensitivities. -- D.B., Tulsa
Advertisement
DEAR D.B.: We have only begun to appreciate the powers of the placebo -- a treatment with no therapeutic effect. Despite its absence of efficacy, the placebo plays a crucial role in health and research. An instructive example is the "placebo effect," which helps us account for results likely to occur simply because study subjects believe they will.
In research, study volunteers are split into two matched groups, and all participants receive the same instructions; for example, they are told that they will be testing a product to see if it makes them feel a certain way. Half the participants are given the active ingredient, while the other half are given a placebo. When the subjects don't know what they are receiving but the researcher does, it's called a "single-blind" study. A "double-blind" study is when both the researchers and the study participants are unaware of which group receives the active ingredient. (Double-blind, placebo-controlled research is considered the gold standard.)
It's in our best interest to know that what we take is effective, and not just the result of the placebo effect. For hucksters, the placebo effect is a blessing -- sales promotions and peer pressure among users can generate positive attention to an ineffective product. Underlying all of this is the fact that our bodies are wonderful self-healing organisms.
Back to your question. If you have a food sensitivity, allergy or intolerance, you would expect to experience a reaction when consuming the offending substance, whether you are aware of its presence or not. But what if you only think you are sensitive, or only think the food has the bad stuff, when neither of these is the case?
I recall a discussion in graduate school about the case of an individual who had a digestive problem who stopped eating a certain food because they read it might be the cause of their symptoms. They made significant adjustments to their diet, and the reaction went away, reappearing any time they would give it another try. They later learned that a different food they routinely ate -- and did not react to -- included the same substance. After testing, it was learned that they were not sensitive to the suspect food; more tests revealed that a separate, treatable issue was involved.
Nobody likes to think they can be fooled, but it remains a testament to the powers of the mind that we may not always appreciate. It also reinforces the need to find out what is actually occurring. Scientists testing for food allergies can use double-blind and repeat-testing methods to ensure accurate diagnoses. The message here is that it is in our best interest to verify that food reactions are genuine and not the result of expectations. (For more on placebos, see b.link/hk8mj6c.)
Send questions to: "On Nutrition," Ed Blonz, c/o Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO, 64106. Send email inquiries to questions@blonz.com. Due to the volume of mail, personal replies cannot be provided.