Q: My job basically consumes me. I feel completely frazzled most of the time, but even taking a day off occasionally doesn't seem to help. What can I do?
Advertisement
Jim: A few summers ago, I crashed my motorcycle and broke my ankle. I canceled trips and hunkered down at home, grateful for the extra time with family. But there was one event I didn't cancel, and it taught me a valuable lesson.
Just a day into my convalescence, I was scheduled to tape a radio program with a guest who had come from out of town. He graciously offered to reschedule, but I insisted we keep our plans. Ironically, the guest was a doctor who now makes his living encouraging people to slow down and build margin into their lives.
I realized that I had been guilty of the very thing he was urging our listeners not to do -- and if not for the accident, probably still would be!
The challenge of maintaining a healthy work/life balance, especially in a down economy, is a big problem. Add to the mix the fact that technology allows us to work anywhere, we now tend to work everywhere -- and at any time. I have to admit that I'm guilty of answering emails at all hours. I justify it by rationalizing that doing work now will save work later -- but somehow, come later, there is always more work to be done!
Public speaking experts customize their advice to the client, but as a general rule of thumb, they always say that however slow you think you're speaking, you should probably speak even slower. The same is true with life. Slow it down and take an extended break. You won't regret it.
Q: I sometimes find myself conflicted when it comes to music, movies and other forms of entertainment. My main struggle has to do with certain creative artists who embrace values and lifestyles with which I strongly disagree. Even in cases where they perform or are part of something positive and redeeming, I still feel obligated to refuse supporting them with my money or expose my impressionable children to their influence. What's the right thing to do?
Bob Waliszewski, Director, Plugged-In: Back in 2005, a wonderful movie ("End of the Spear") was released about five young missionaries to Ecuador who were martyred in 1956. Although too violent for younger viewers, the film had all the right elements for teens on up. It was uplifting and encouraging and had the power to motivate people to similarly, and selflessly, serve others.
However, after the film was made, several called for a boycott because, as you said, one of the actors "embraced values and lifestyles with which (those calling for the boycott) strongly disagree(d)." I, too, disagreed with that person's values and lifestyle. But I feel every entertainment product should be evaluated upon its message(s) solely and not the behaviors of the singer, actor, video game maker, etc.
If one eliminates all entertainment based upon the actions of those involved, how far down the list do you go? You might skip a movie over its headline actor, but do you refuse to watch if someone in a scene's background has made poor moral choices? What about the men and women behind the cameras? Or those in charge of lighting? Caterers? Set-builders? The point is, it's impossible to know everything.
A better standard is to let every song, TV show, movie, video game, etc. stand or fall on its own moral merits (or lack thereof). Every form of entertainment has a message, intentional or unintentional. When the message is uplifting and inspiring, celebrate it even if the messenger is flawed (as all of us are to some degree!).
Jim Daly is a husband and father, an author, and president of Focus on the Family and host of the Focus on the Family radio program. Catch up with him at www.jimdalyblog.com or at www.facebook.com/DalyFocus.
INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT SECURED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.