DEAR READERS: Our forests are in peril from fires, high winds and droughts. An estimated 11% to 16% of U.S. tree species are threatened with extinction, with the most common threat being invasive and problematic pests and diseases.
Advertisement
We need the trees to hold the hills and mountainsides to prevent erosion; to sequester carbon emissions, thereby reducing global warming and mitigating climate change; and to produce the oxygen we and most other life forms need to live. Regardless, trees are still seen primarily as a resource to be harvested.
What is utterly absurd is that taxpayer subsidies for the federal logging program ranged from $1.6 billion to $1.8 billion annually in fiscal years 2013 through 2017 (source: the Center for Sustainable Economy). A report on TennesseeHeartwood.org states, "The Forest Service attempts to justify these losses by hiding commercial timber sale projects within larger ecological restoration projects -- a move that consistently lands the agency in court. Selling timber from federal lands below cost is a form of environmentally harmful subsidy that runs afoul of international agreements."
If the Biden administration is serious about climate change, a significant initiative would be to end the timber industry subsidies, which should be diverted to reforestation and conservation.
Aside from economic issues, the country's trees are plagued by insects that have been given free range thanks to the spraying of insecticides and the wholesale applications of pesticides by the agricultural and agroforestry industries. In the process, beneficial pollinators are killed and insectivorous reptiles, amphibians and birds are either poisoned or starve to death.
The loss of America's trees, and those of other nations, may indeed culminate in the ancient prophetic warning that when the trees are gone, the sky will fall. As Franklin Roosevelt said, "A nation that destroys its soils destroys itself. Forests are the lungs of our land, purifying the air and giving fresh strength to our people."
I have the greatest sympathy for the many residents and animals of Florida now recovering from Hurricane Ida. Such devastating and costly events are predicted to become more frequent and intense. Deforestation, in part a contributing factor to this climate crisis, will intensify with the escalating demand for timber to restore damaged buildings and construct new homes.
Part of the Florida tragedy can be attributed to the Army Corps of Engineers and other groups, which altered watersheds and drained wetlands and coastal marshlands for real estate and agricultural development. In eliminating these natural water-catchment and containment sinks, they made residents and farmers -- along with their crops and animals -- more vulnerable to flooding.
Massive quantities of precipitation, punctuated by periods of drought, are predicted for the coming years, due to the additional moisture in our warming atmosphere from the melting of polar ice. More hurricanes and cyclones will be energized by warming oceans. Rebuilding without first restoring the woodlands, wetlands and coastal marshlands would be imprudent.
There is good news for wildlife and biodiversity in some towns along the Mississippi River, where acres of corn and soy fields, once flood-plain wetlands and prairie grasslands, are being returned to nature as an effective method of community flood control. With increased rainfall caused by climate change, the locks, dams and levees are no longer effective, so nature-based solutions are being initiated. This is an example of enlightened ecological thinking and restoration.
On the homefront, those who are able should plant indigenous trees and native grasses. The practice of "rewilding" is preferable to wasting water and energy mowing monoculture grass lawns, and applying harmful chemicals to both lawns and golf courses. Many neighborhoods and cities are creating or restoring tree canopies to provide shade, reducing residents' utility bills for air conditioning and creating a healthier environment.
If we had all respected and empathized with the wildlife in the forests and wetlands, we would have protected them. How many mourn the silence of the frogs? All of us who do must rise up, voice our concerns and vote for political leadership dedicated to eco-justice.
Democratic principles of justice, the rule of law and the common good are ill-served when there is no ethical basis for the practice of law by attorneys who put winning over the morality of right and wrong. Every law student should have to read Christopher D. Stone's 1972 book "Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects." We might then, eventually, have a Supreme Court that better serves the collective good.
(Send all mail to animaldocfox@gmail.com or to Dr. Michael Fox in care of Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. The volume of mail received prohibits personal replies, but questions and comments of general interest will be discussed in future columns.
Visit Dr. Fox’s website at DrFoxOneHealth.com.)