DEAR DR. FOX: I read your recent column, where a reader disagreed with your stance on cat TNVR (trap, neuter, vaccinate, release). However, you did not say what your alternative is to releasing unadopted cats outdoors to fend for themselves.
Advertisement
I know you wish ferals could find homes, or live out their lives at sanctuaries with proper outdoor enclosures. We all know that is not possible, as the numbers are far too high. That leaves killing them. I am guessing you will call for humane euthanasia over culling them like Australian kangaroos. But even if humane euthanasia was an option, how do you propose catching them all? Many do not go into a trap a second time.
I just want to hear what the solution is, in your opinion. It is going to be very grim.
I really enjoy your speaking out on behalf of the planet and wildlife and the suffering caused by factory farms, but I just cannot wrap my head around killing millions and millions of cats! -- G.C., West Palm Beach, Florida
DEAR G.C.: This is a painful issue for those of us who care deeply for all creatures great and small. There are solutions. The preventive, long-term one is for all municipalities to make it illegal for cat owners to allow their cats to roam free outside their property, just as it is for dogs.
Owners need to be informed about vaccinations and neutering -- especially for male cats, who will begin to spray-mark in the home when they mature, if not neutered. Many will then get thrown out of their homes, or find a way to get out.
Animal shelters are filling up again across the U.S., which breaks my heart. It is also a moral injury to veterinarians and staff when they must euthanize healthy cats and dogs.
Free-roaming cats can be trapped by animal control agents to protect public health, the cats themselves and the wildlife they prey on. Funds are needed to expand quarantine facilities and provide more group housing and care, euthanasia being the humane alternative until such facilities are available. To choose TNVR in opposition to euthanasia is to condemn cats to a short life of high vigilance, surviving only by killing, if they can.
I see the “no-kill” animal shelter claim as part of the current pro-life movement, which is similarly moralistic and lacking in compassion. Both philosophies can have pernicious consequences in practice.
For more on the harm done by "no-kill" shelters, visit: peta.org/issues/animal-companion-issues/animal-shelters/no-kill-policies-slowly-killing-animals.
UPDATE ON ANIMAL SHELTER CRISIS
2023 ended with 250,000 more animals in shelters than there were at the end of 2022, according to Shelter Animals Count, which compiles data from about 7,000 facilities across the country. Financial hardships discourage some people from adopting in the first place and force others to give up their beloved pets, says Stephanie Filer, executive director of Shelter Animals Count.
Katy Hansen, communications director at Animal Care Centers of NYC, says housing instability is a driving force of the problem. She says that Animal Care Centers prevented nearly 3,000 pet surrenders in New York City last year by offering temporary boarding, free pet food and training assistance, but these measures only go so far when many rentals don't allow pets. Landlords "pretty much have the upper hand," she says. (Full story: CBS News, Jan. 8)
DEAR DR. FOX: My wife and I had golden retrievers for many years. We usually had two at a time. Years ago, after our oldest dog died, we decided to wait a bit and get a "solo" puppy. That puppy is now 10 years old and extremely healthy and playful, taking a 45- to 60-minute walk most days.
The puppy was my wife’s best buddy; unfortunately, she passed away four years ago. The dog was with her when she passed, and seems to understand. I have taken over as her buddy, and everything is good. Now being a widower at 74, the dog is my constant companion and fills some of the emptiness in my life.
As the dog gets older, I plan to get another retriever puppy from a reputable breeder, a family-run business not too far away. They do all the puppy health screenings and even have the adults' DNA checked. So, what advice do you have for acclimating my only (spoiled) dog to a new puppy?
Years ago, when we had a new pup come in, there were three of us to provide attention and guidance. Now it’s only me, so I would like advice on getting the puppy and older dog acquainted -- and keeping the older dog from feeling left out. -- G.A.C., Cassopolis, Michigan
DEAR G.A.C.: I am glad that your dog is such a companion and comfort for you after the passing of your wife. I am in a similar situation: My wife, Deanna, recently died, leaving me with the dog she rescued from our local shelter, who now never leaves my side.
In my opinion, it would be very disrupting for the bond you have with your now-aging golden retriever -- and more work, with house-training and such -- for you to get a puppy. Certainly, golden retrievers are very amicable dogs and usually get along well with everyone. But even the friendliest puppy will require much in the way of attention and energy.
You must also consider the possibility that a puppy could outlive you. If you do decide to get one from the breeder, what provisions will you be making for someone to take the dog if needed?
Perhaps a compromise would be to get an adult dog from the breeder instead -- one that is well socialized, finished having litters and ready to serve as a "buddy" to you and your other dog.
(Send all mail to animaldocfox@gmail.com or to Dr. Michael Fox in care of Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. The volume of mail received prohibits personal replies, but questions and comments of general interest will be discussed in future columns.
Visit Dr. Fox’s website at DrFoxOneHealth.com.)