DEAR READERS: Please see this excerpt from an October release from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, entitled “Technical Report: September 2023 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Viruses.” It contains data collected by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), which is part of the USDA.
Advertisement
“In the United States, from May 2022 through September 22, 2023, USDA APHIS reported HPAI A(H5N1) virus detections in 200 mammals comprising 20 different species in 26 states or territories. Globally, sporadic HPAI A(H5N1) virus infections have been reported in farmed mink in Spain and farmed foxes and other mammals in Finland, harbor and gray seals in the United States, sea lions in Peru, Argentina, and Chile, and in many other wild mammal species in several countries, including domesticated pets such as cats in Poland, France, South Korea, and the United States, and dogs in Italy. The reports of HPAI A(H5N1) virus infections in mammals are not surprising given the widespread outbreaks of HPAI A(H5N1) virus infections in wild birds worldwide.”
The full article is available at cdc.gov/bird-flu/php/technical-report/h5n1-100523.html.
Readers wanting more details can read this excellent article by Jonathan Runstadler and Wendy Puryear: “The virus is out of the barn: The emergence of HPAI as a pathogen of avian and mammalian wildlife around the globe,” published in The American Journal of Veterinary Research in May (doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.01.0018).
According to my records and estimates, the number of mammals being infected with this virus is in the thousands. And the more hosts the virus infects, the greater the possibility of spillover into the human population.
DEAR DR. FOX: I want to draw your attention to an article by Erin Adler -- “Feral cats and the fix too far” -- which ran in the Star Tribune in July. It reports that because of rising costs, the Animal Humane Society (AHA) is charging $75 to sterilize all cats considered unadoptable before releasing them to the neighborhoods where they were caught under their “community cat” TNR (trap, neuter, release) program.
Other rescue organizations are facing similar financial issues, especially since the “number of stray or abandoned cats has already skyrocketed in recent years because people can’t afford them or don’t want them post-pandemic,” Adler writes.
What solutions do you have to offer? You have written a lot about TNR, questioning the claim that it helps reduce feral cat numbers. It seems evident to me that the situation will get worse with more sick and injured cats out there, and more cats killing birds and other wildlife. -- J.L., Minneapolis
DEAR J.L.: I have read this article, noting in earlier reports that the AHA releases hundreds of purportedly unadoptable cats into surrounding communities to survive on their own. My late wife and I rescued and rehomed several such cats.
Many shelters across the U.S. are full to capacity as people surrender their cats and dogs because of rising care costs and/or housing restrictions. And with the shelters full, some people are simply letting their cats go free to fend for themselves. This is a tragedy indeed, meaning more animal suffering: a slow death for many cats, more decimation of wildlife, and increased risks to public health from the diseases cats can carry.
Charging people who bring in cats they have saved from the outdoors is likely to backfire, becoming a financial deterrent for would-be animal rescuers when the word gets out that this good deed comes with a price. This is a sad reflection of the rising costs of operating animal shelters, which all communities should support.
Aside from the problem of rising inflation, there is the thorny ideology of “no kill” shelters, which does not face the real necessity of having to euthanize otherwise healthy animals when there are too many of them and too few responsible adopters. I see this as a moral dilemma and an emotional burden on those involved in humane euthanasia.
It is much like the abortion rights issue. As an advocate of the ethic of reverence for all life, I see the pro-life ideology as causing more harm than good when not cast in the broader perspective of One Health and Welfare, which is the complex subject of my next book. In essence, the quality of life and consequences for all involved must be considered.
In sum, cat TNR should be prohibited, since only under exceptional circumstances has any significant reduction in free-roaming cats been accomplished. And women’s reproductive rights should be protected -- not undermined by patriarchy and by misguided, albeit well-intended, forces.
(Send all mail to animaldocfox@gmail.com or to Dr. Michael Fox in care of Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. The volume of mail received prohibits personal replies, but questions and comments of general interest will be discussed in future columns.
Visit Dr. Fox’s website at DrFoxOneHealth.com.)