DEAR READERS: Organic, regenerative farming practices are a core component of One Health, benefiting the environment, wildlife and consumers. The cancers of our brains and bodies mirror the cancer of the soul of industrial civilization; the spiritual connections with all our relations have been severed in the name of progress and profits.

The soil, air and water are poisoned with pesticides and other chemicals used in conventional, industrial agriculture. Animals raised for food are given drugs that harm them -- and consumers -- while other species are subject to mass extinction. The net result is ecological dysbiosis with the disruption of beneficial microorganisms in the soil and in our guts. This, in turn, contributes to climate change, dysfunctional economies and ever-sicker communities, many members of which cannot afford health insurance.

A secular, Earth-saving and restorative spirituality is spreading to counter these harmful forces. More consumers are voting with their dollars, purchasing organically certified foods and opting for plant-based diets, the public health and environmental benefits of which have been well documented. For example, see the study "Cardiometabolic benefits of a non-industrialized-type diet are linked to gut microbiome modulation" by Fuyong Li et al., published in Cell in March. See also Dr. Will Tuttle’s book, "The World Peace Diet."

To make organically certified produce more available and affordable, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services should subsidize organic, regenerative agriculture without further delay.

Recycling organic waste is also crucial. One method is to create biochar: The process involves heating organic waste in a low-oxygen environment, essentially taking carbon out of the atmosphere and sequestering it in charcoal. Biochar, when added to the soil, increases organic matter and water retention.

Animal and human waste can be processed into biogas and fertilizer, but with the advent of the flush toilet, most human waste instead goes into sewage systems, many of which pollute fresh and marine water ecosystems. Capturing and recycling unprocessed sewage for agricultural purposes has led to the closure of some farms because of toxic chemical contamination. Fortunately, such practices are prohibited under organic certification standards.

DEAR DR. FOX: I am a freelance journalist, and I’m wondering if you saw the paper out of Korea about successfully engineering a hypoallergenic cat through CRISPR. If so, what do you think about it?

Are we still pretty far from hypoallergenic cats being commercially bred for our homes? Or will that be coming soon, in your opinion? -- A.Z., Brooklyn, New York

DEAR A.Z.: Thank you for alerting me to this report about using gene editing to create a hypoallergenic cat, who was then was cloned to create a similar feline. (Study: "Generation of Fel d 1 chain 2 genome-edited cats by CRISPR-Cas9 system" by Sang Ryeul Lee et al., published in Scientific Reports, February 2024.)

I am, in principle, opposed to the genetic engineering of animals, including the cloning of dogs and cats, because of the potential for adverse pleiotropic effects -- unanticipated genetic dysfunctions. The risks are compounded by the exploitation of surrogate mothers for these animals. Even if successful, scaling up this technology to create hypoallergenic cats will take time and money.

There are alternatives that may be beneficial for cat owners who are allergic to their cats’ dander. One is a food additive called LiveClear by Purina, marketed to make cats less allergenic to people. It utilizes a protein derived from eggs that binds to the primary cat allergen in a cat’s saliva, neutralizing it when the cat grooms itself -- effectively reducing the amount of allergen present in the fur and dander. And U.S. company Pacagen markets a household spray and a food topping, both of which claim to block the allergen in cat saliva.

Many people with mild cat allergies can get by with wearing a glove and wiping their cat twice daily with a moist, unscented wipe such as Huggies plant-based wipes.

Some cats are reportedly hypoallergenic, according to people who have told me that they are allergic to other people's cats, but not their own. No breed was identified in these cases. Mutant hairless cats may be less allergenic, but I am opposed to the creation of any such extreme mutations in domestic animals.

I would like to hear from readers who have used Purina’s product or those from Pacagen.

(Send all mail to animaldocfox@gmail.com or to Dr. Michael Fox in care of Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. The volume of mail received prohibits personal replies, but questions and comments of general interest will be discussed in future columns.

Visit Dr. Fox’s website at DrFoxOneHealth.com.)

DEAR READERS: The practice of recycling slaughterhouse discards and rendering plant remains of animals into dog (and cat) foods needs to end. The strong and highly profitable alliance between Big Animal Ag and Big Petfood industries using companion animals as recipients of food ingredients that can jeopardize their health must be broken. For an excellent review by Alice Oven, go to foodfacts.org/articles/diets-dogs-media-health-plant-based-dog-food.

At least one company, Earth Animal, with its Wisdom dog foods, is breaking this alliance. But more involvement by all pet owners who care for their animals and are not brainwashed by the advertising and false claims of most major pet food manufacturers is called for. Healthful diets mean healthier companion animals and fewer costly veterinary care expenses, if any!

Also see: truthaboutpetfood.com/how-its-made-the-most-common-animal-ingredient-in-dry-pet-foods/

Explore alternative pet food sources, such as Earth Animal, that do not recycle dead animal parts discarded for human consumption and subject the ingredients to high heat-processing, which destroys many essential nutrients. Part of my dog’s diet is the Wisdom Air-Dried From the Seed recipe developed by Dr. Bob Goldstein. For details, visit earthanimal.com

Consumer Reports tested 58 dog foods from brands including Blue Buffalo, Hill’s Science Diet and Purina for key nutrients and dangerous contaminants.

“First, the good news: We did not find widespread or dangerous problems in the samples of dog food that we tested. ... We detected aflatoxins in only one dog food, and at an average aflatoxin concentration of 1.8 parts per billion (ppb) across the three samples. That’s well under the 20 ppb 'action level' above which the Food and Drug Administration would consider taking action against a potentially harmful product. ... But we did detect listeria in four out of the 174 samples. We found Listeria monocytogenes, the type of listeria bacteria that is known to cause illness, in one sample of Raw Bistro’s Free Range Chicken Entree and one sample of Viva for Dogs Ground Beef meal -- both frozen raw dog foods. The other two samples of Viva for Dogs Ground Beef raw meal we tested contained Listeria innocua, which does not typically cause sickness but is sometimes considered an indicator of the potential presence of harmful listeria bacteria. Viva Raw recalled five products in July 2024 for Listeria monocytogenes contamination, though the list of recalled products did not include the product we tested.”

For more details, go to: consumerreports.org/health/pet-food/whats-really-in-your-dogs-food-a1115304393.

Be sure that what you are feeding your dog is approved by your veterinarian, as some breeds and individual dogs with health issues may need a different dietary formulation from what you are feeding.

Adverse events associated with pet foods recorded by the FDA in the first six months of 2024:

-- The FDA received 1,705 reports of sick pets linked to Purina pet food products, with 206 pet death reports.

-- 119 reports of sick pets linked to Mars Petcare pet food products, with six pet death reports.

-- 31 reports of sick pets linked to Hill’s pet food products, with two pet death reports.

-- 26 reports of sick pets linked to Diamond pet food products, with one pet death report.

For more details, go to: truthaboutpetfood.com/purina-pet-food-adverse-event-reports-finally-provided-by-fda

Also, view the video "Pet Fooled: The Shocking Truth About the Pet Food Industry" here: youtube.com/watch?v=5XC1rUWWnxI.

Many people now prepare cat and dog food from known, whole ingredients, but just serving rice and chicken or ground beef is unwise because of essential nutrient deficiencies. Home-prepared recipes for cats and dogs are posted on my website, drfoxonehealth.com, along with letters from those who found them beneficial for their companion animals.

(Send all mail to animaldocfox@gmail.com or to Dr. Michael Fox in care of Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. The volume of mail received prohibits personal replies, but questions and comments of general interest will be discussed in future columns.

Visit Dr. Fox’s website at DrFoxOneHealth.com.)

DEAR READERS: Dr. Tony Jones, a theologian and former pastor, has written a memoir called "The God of Wild Places: Rediscovering the Divine in the Untamed Outdoors.” He writes: “Reflecting on the inevitability of my own death, I’ve made the conscious choice to cause death. Anyone who eats meat causes death, but it’s usually outsourced to people who work at kill plants. I’ve chosen to actively participate in the death of my fellow creatures, to end their lives and take their flesh into my body as food.” Touching on the sacramental ethos of our paleolithic past, hunting and killing to survive, Jones’ website (reverendhunter.com) opens the path to finding God in nature and the nature of God through hunting and killing.

Life gives to life, and life takes from life in the prey-predator relationship. This memoir by a former Christian pastor who went feral is deeply moving and disturbing. As I emphasize in several poems in my book “For All Our Relations: Visions and Vexations of a Veterinarian,” there are many ways to restore our feral sensibilities. One must question what kind of God created such a world as ours with predators and parasites. Now, with 8 billion humans on this planet, there is little left of the “untouched outdoors” that is in urgent need of protection and expansion. For God’s sake -- and nature’s -- the fewer animals we raise and have others kill for us to eat, the better. Many rediscover the divine simply by observing and filming wildlife. There is no need to kill.

In his book “The Art of Happiness,” the Dalai Lama wrote: “Ask a hunter to visualize his favorite hunting dog being shot or caught in a trap to awaken feelings of compassion. Then he may better imagine the suffering of his prey.” Such envisioning is the bridge of empathy enabling us to feel for others and to exercise our moral freedom of choice to act responsibly. To take pleasure in the hunt and the kill, and to enjoy wearing designer fashion furs from animals snared and trapped, are aberrations of the ethics and spirituality of a subsistence way of living and of valuing life that was sustainable for millennia in our gatherer-hunter past. Now our children are corrupted by the values of consumerism and of treating other sentient beings as objects and commodities rather than as subjects of communion and community.

It is now documented that the first humans, going back 2 million years, were hunter-gatherers. Agriculture and animal domestication are relatively recent, within the last 10,000 years. We can see that hunting is deeply embedded in the human psyche, but unlike other predators, such as wolves and lions, our numbers have increased. Wolves practice social control of population -- dominant wolves prevent others from mating -- and lions kill the offspring of lionesses that are from other lions. It is time for us to evolve, promote family planning and not continue to face population-regulating wars, famines and plagues.

DEAR DR. FOX: I have been reading your column for years in The Palm Beach Post. Your article “Recovering and sharing truth and trust” hit the nail on the head. Thank you for calling it what it has become ... an “opposition to science as another example of bio-fascism.” Now where can I find your new book, "One Health: Veterinary, Ethical and Environmental Perspectives"? -- C.H., West Palm Beach, Florida

DEAR C.H.: My new book is filled with reference citations documenting the issues we face and what we all can do. People in the U.S. can order the book from routledge.com. All royalties that I receive are donated to animal protection and conservation.

Here are the talking points put out by my publisher:

“The rising incidence of zoonotic diseases from farmed animals and wildlife in the expanding human population (and so-called reverse zoonoses, where humans are infecting other species) are existential concerns. These concerns are linked with anthropogenic climate change and our impact on ecosystems which threaten biodiversity and the health and future of mankind and many other species. These interconnected issues are examined in this book, broadening the scope and agenda of what is currently more narrowly practiced as ‘preventive medicine.'

"Holistic preventive health-care maintenance can offer a viable alternative to the escalating costs of human and companion animal health problems, the poor welfare of factory farmed animals, and endangered status of many wild species.

"Fearlessly tackling contentious issues and ‘wicked problems,’ Dr. Michael W. Fox offers an integrated perspective of what One Health looks like on the ground.”

I also emphasize how changing our diets can help improve our health, save the planet and reduce animal suffering, and the importance of educating children about animals and the environment and getting them outdoors into nature.

(Send all mail to animaldocfox@gmail.com or to Dr. Michael Fox in care of Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. The volume of mail received prohibits personal replies, but questions and comments of general interest will be discussed in future columns.

Visit Dr. Fox’s website at DrFoxOneHealth.com.)