DEAR SOMEONE ELSE’S MOM: Our daughter and new son-in-law each had a condo before they ever met and got married. It seems strange to my wife and me that they have told us even though they are married, they intend to continue keeping both places, with no intention of renting or selling at least one. They said they like the idea of each having a place they can go to be on their own a few nights a week.
Advertisement
My wife and I have been married 32 years, and have always shared our homes together. We started out in a tiny apartment, and worked our way up to the house where we raised our kids. It never occurred to either of us to have separate homes to escape to — although during the raising of our kids, it would have been nice to have somewhere to hide once in a while!
Does this mean, as my wife suggests, the two of them have not fully committed to their marriage, or can you think of less gloom and doom reasons for a young couple to have separate homes after getting married? --- ONE HOME WORKS FOR US
DEAR ONE HOME WORKS FOR US: It could have absolutely nothing to do with a reluctance for the couple to commit to their marriage.
In fact, there’s a term for your daughter’s and son-in-law’s living arrangement. It’s called “living alone together,” and it appears to not be as uncommon as you might think. From what I understand, some couples see it as a way to strengthen their relationship.
The newlyweds in your family have chosen this option for their own reasons. Perhaps you can eventually ask them directly why they have decided on this separate homes lifestyle. For now though, I think you and your wife should not jump to any dour conclusions.