DEAR SOMEONE ELSE’S MOM: My great-uncle came to live with my family when I was seven or eight. I remember how funny and patient he was with my brother and me. When I think back on it now, I can hardly believe someone in his mid-seventies and with some serious health problems was willing to put up with having two little kids as crazy as me and my brother were back then.
Advertisement
Uncle Gerald is now nearing 90. He beat cancer twice, had bypass surgery, and has a colostomy bag.
My mother told me he was diagnosed with kidney failure, and he started dialysis.
I have seen mixed things about dialysis for older people and I think it is just keeping Uncle Gerald alive for my relatives’ sake and probably not what he wants. He said something like that to me when I saw him and we talked about being kept alive by machines when it’s your time to go.
I don’t want to lose my uncle. I have loved him most of my life. But I also don’t see how it is good for him to be forced to keep going through medical treatments when he is ready to go and is just going through all this to make other people happy.
Doesn’t he have the right to say no to all this and let himself go naturally? --- LET HIM HAVE PEACE
DEAR LET HIM HAVE PEACE: Watching a loved one in decline is sad and painful, and when choices over how and if to prolong life are involved, it can become even more difficult.
I agree that your uncle most certainly has a say in his medical treatment plan. Hopefully he has advance directives in place to make his wishes known should he become unable to speak for himself. Living wills and advance directives, although not foolproof, give an individual essential input in what happens to them at the end of their lives.
If your uncle truly is ready to let his time end, and he’s of sound mind and is able to do so, he needs to clearly communicate his wishes to those directly involved in his medical care.
What he’s telling you and what they currently believe he wants may be entirely different things.