DEAR MISS MANNERS: Why is it that people see it as mandatory to send a thank-you for a gift? It seems like people give gifts with the sole purpose of being appreciated. This seems contrary to the whole idea of giving a gift.
To explain further, let me tell you how I give gifts. I have a large family that is pretty far-flung. Some years I’m in touch with certain members; other years I’m in touch with others. When the holidays come around and I am shopping for gifts, I look for things that remind me of them and of conversations we've had.
Gifts, to me, are not a chore and not an obligation. If I get a thank-you card, it is nice, but I do not see any obligation on their part to send me one. I got my reward already.
Why are thank-you cards so brutal and draconian?
GENTLE READER: What’s that? People are sending brutal, draconian thank-you cards?
Well, that would be wicked. But Miss Manners guesses that you mean that you consider the requirement to send them to be brutal and draconian.
Usually, that is the claim of people who are on the receiving end of presents. It is unusual for a generous giver, as you seem to be, to make that argument. But you have in common with them the idea that the act of giving should be a sufficient reward.
Don’t you want to know that your present was a success? Or even just that it was actually received? Would it not be rewarding to hear that the recipients of your thoughtfulness were pleased?
It’s called feedback.