DEAR MISS MANNERS: My place of work has recently relocated into a different building, and the ladies' restroom is not a "single user" like we had at our previous location. There are two toilet stalls next to each other, which means that one can no longer do their business in assured privacy.
Advertisement
The other day, I walked into the restroom just as a gentlewoman colleague was furiously unleashing an unpleasant barrage of waste from her bowels. It was both noisy and aromatic.
I immediately turned around and left the restroom, returning a few minutes later, when I was sure this colleague had finished and departed the restroom.
But I fear if the tables were turned -- if I were the one to "explode" into the toilet -- that a colleague would not offer me the same privacy.
I've been to sporting events, concerts and airports that have a bank of 20 or more stalls in the ladies' room, and that does not bother me as much because those restrooms are noisy -- toilets flushing, women talking, faucets running, etc. And even when those restrooms are not so active and noisy, you can at least select a stall that's not directly next to an occupied one. You can distance yourself.
But in a two-stall restroom, this is not possible, so what is proper in this situation? I am tempted to ask a higher-up about putting some sort of lock on the inside (perhaps a simple hook and eye) so a user has an option to "do their business" in privacy.
GENTLE READER: Welp. There goes breakfast. And not, Miss Manners reluctantly assures you, by the same means as your unnecessarily graphic description.
Etiquette dictates that one works as hard as possible not to notice bodily functions -- especially when they are already being taken care of in the proper facilities. But sure, ask your supervisor for a lock. Just please spare them the vivid descriptions that you unduly leashed on Miss Manners and her hapless readers.