DEAR MISS MANNERS: As a lawyer, due to the nature of my work and the nature of the law, I’m frequently in the position of having to give unwelcome news to clients. This often results in entirely unwarranted verbal abuse -- a version of shooting the messenger.
Advertisement
While I sympathize with clients’ frustrations, and with personal challenges that may aggravate their responses to a situation, at times it is very difficult to take.
Is it more polite to 1. simply be silent and end the conversation quickly; 2. try to continue explaining, in hopes of advancing a client’s understanding; or 3. object to personal insults as they arise? Or a combination?
It’s perhaps relevant that none of the clients are paying for my time; they are being given free legal assistance. I only mention this to clarify that I have no financial motive to prolong an abusive encounter. But should their difficult life circumstances affect the extent to which I listen to abuse, for the sake of politeness?
GENTLE READER: “I understand that you are frustrated, but I am only relaying the message and trying to help you solve the problem. If you continue like this, I am afraid that I will no longer be able to assist.”
Miss Manners believes this a reasonable reaction, no matter what the financial relationship or hardship. After all, being polite is also free.