DEAR DR. NERDLOVE: Something that has been bothering me is the pressure to be that interesting, fun, funny, good looking etc. etc. etc. guy that women go absolutely nuts over. I’m not talking about the incel’s god “chad” but basically what you’ve laid out in previous material (becoming more charming, better clothes etc.)
Advertisement
At the same time though, I’m pretty happy with who I am now and while I’ve made a lot of improvements already (career, martial arts, skydiving, weight loss etc.) I still feel this pressure to be that mythical “perfect dude.” I feel that I can still do just fine as the imperfect but still pretty cool version of myself I am, but it’s at odds with the image I’ve built up in my head.
That and spending all of my time trying to become this person, and always being funny, charming, adventurous etc. sounds REALLY exhausting.
Less Perfect Tommy
DEAR LESS THAN PERFECT TOMMY: This is one of those times when there are multiple issues all coming together here that are combining into a major misunderstanding – like watching three or four different people coming to the same wrong conclusion from entirely different angles.
The first should be self-evident: you don’t need to be “perfect” to date. In fact, one of the more common complaints I’ve seen are people who feel like they are perfect – or damn near – grumbling that they’re struggling trying to find a date while a dude who looks like a Waffle House fry cook with a side hustle in meth gets more strange ass than a dude at a mutant donkey auction.
This sort of pressure is almost entirely self-imposed and almost always comes from other men who want to pontificate endlessly on what women “really” want – usually punctuated with appeals to “look at how much attention $FLAVOR_OF_THE_MONTH gets on Instagram” or talking about the long-misunderstood 80/20 garbage, especially around dating apps.
(This is a classic case of “figures don’t lie, but liars don’t figure”, where folks miss that the reality is that most users on dating apps are male – 75-80% depending on the app – and many of the women – 20-25% –on the site aren’t active.)
A lot of it is also pure assumption; folks assume that when someone stops talking to them on an app or doesn’t match with them or a first date doesn’t lead to a second, it must be because they’re “not good enough” and that they need to reach some mythical peak of attractiveness in order to date.
The truth is that, despite what folks will insist, it’s not that women are too picky or selective or that there’s some weird evo-psych thing going on. The truth is that the attraction or interest just wasn’t there, and that can be for any number of reasons. Sometimes it’s a skill issue, where one person or the other simply isn’t that good at conveying interest or connecting with the other person. Sometimes it’s that there’s a compatibility mismatch, where one person either lacks a necessary quality or has one that the other considers to be a deal breaker. And sometimes it’s just as simple and banal as “there’s nothing wrong with the other person, I’m just not feeling it.”
None of these are due to a flaw or a lack of perfection in the person who was rejected. It’s just that sometimes someone’s not going to be into you, no matter what and that’s fine. You don’t like every woman you meet either and some folks are just not going to do it for you, even when there’s nothing wrong with them. In fact, I rather suspect that if you were to look at the people you’re attracted to, you’d realize that you aren’t expecting them to be perfect or your 100% ideal partner. So it is a good time to ask yourself why you feel like you have to be exceptional in order to date, but the people you date get afforded a measure of grace that you won’t give yourself.
If you can see yourself dating someone who isn’t an opera-singing super model who also does archeology in her spare time while pursuing her PhD in quantum mechanics, why would you assume that women will only date the real-life equivalent of Doc Savage?
The second issue is mistaking those qualities for what makes someone attractive. Here’s what folks miss about attraction: it’s about feelings, not accomplishments. As I said just this week: the vast majority of women aren’t going to be won over by great deeds or by your resume. A lot of stuff that guys will rattle off as what should make them more desirable can be interesting, it can offer opportunity or security… but that doesn’t mean that it makes the person attractive. Not if the person who does those things isn’t able to connect with other people.
The most obvious counterargument to all the usual “women only want the top 10% of men” is the cliché of the dirtbag musician boyfriend – the guy who’s out of work or works dead end jobs, who refuses responsibility because of their “obligations” to their band/music/artistic vision and who seems mostly to sponge off anyone who gets into a relationship with them. Despite practically being a cartoon character of a stereotype, this kind of guy is a cliché for a reason: damn near every woman who dates men has either encountered him or knows someone who has. And the reason why this kind of guy does so well isn’t because he’s Dude Perfect, it’s because he knows how to play on women’s feelings. He’s very good at connecting with people, inspiring particular emotions and feelings and wielding those emotions like a weapon.
That’s what “game” is. That’s what “rizz” is. It’s understanding how to inspire particular emotions, build connection and parlay those feelings into a relationship. That’s really it. Perfection isn’t required. Connection is.
But part of why people struggle with this is because they tend to feel like they’re not enough. They don’t believe in their own worth or value. They don’t believe that women could possibly enjoy their presence or find them interesting on their own merits and so they feel like they need to collect these other qualities like they’re Infinity Stones and assemble the Infinity Gauntlet before they can date. But women aren’t looking for perfection, any more than men are. They’re looking for someone who they enjoy spending time with, who makes them feel good and who gets them.
It’s one thing to pursue various hobbies or ambitions because they’re things you truly enjoy. It’s another to do so because you think they’re prerequisites for being An Attractive Person – the dating meta, if you will – and that you have to align with that specific build in order to unlock the Relationship tree.
The third issue is also simple: you don’t need to be living a life of constant action, adventure, hustle and grind etc. Some of what you’re getting wrong here is the difference between action and essence: being charming vs. having to act charming, having a sense of humor vs. Being Funny and so on.
Now part of the conflict I think you’re running into here is simply the difference between skill states – the effort it takes to make something go from being something you have to do consciously to something that becomes a habit. It can take effort, for example, to force yourself to practice piano every day or perform your katas until you know every move by heart. But once it goes from conscious effort to habit, it becomes something you just do. You get up at 7 AM to get to the gym at 8 AM because it’s become what you do. You strike up conversations with strangers because it’s become your habit to just make small talk when you’re out and about whereas before you had to force yourself to so much as ask someone for the time.
But another part is that you need to recognize that always being “on” not only isn’t necessary, but it can be actively detrimental. Yeah, I know, how could always being charming be a bad thing? Well, among other things, when it gets in the way of the times when you need to be sincere or serious or deal with situations where oozing charm wouldn’t necessarily be appropriate. There are times when what people want isn’t Charming Less Perfect Tommy, it’s Sincere Less Perfect Tommy or Vulnerable Less Perfect Tommy or Compassionate Less Perfect Tommy. It’s a matter of understanding when charm is needed and useful and when what you need is a different quality entirely.
Just as importantly though is that there is always a point not just of diminishing returns but when being always on becomes harmful to your goals – in this case, to connect with someone and build a relationship with them.
For example: Robin Williams was hilarious, both professionally and as a person, but there was Robin Williams the person and Robin Williams the performance. What we see on stage – when he’s doing stand-up, when he’s acting or otherwise being “on” – may be hilarious to watch… but only for an hour or so at a time. Living with someone who is always “on” like that would be exhausting… both for the audience and the performer.
It would also reduce the actual efficacy of his humor. Humans are incredibly adaptable and almost any state can become just the status-quo if it goes on for long enough. If you’re afraid for long enough, the fear eventually just becomes background noise, something that you no longer notice to the same degree, and it doesn’t affect you quite the same way. You become numb to it; there’s nothing you can do about it so past a certain point you just accept it and move on to living with it. The same applies to humor, to charm, to sexiness… any sort of heightened state of arousal or being. Do it for long enough, consistently enough, with no breaks and it just becomes the norm, less noticeable and far less special or effective.
This is true in fiction, in music, in media and in people. This is why even in performance, there’s an ebb and flow, a crescendo followed by a diminuendo, where a moment of excitement is followed by a moment of calm to allow the audience to breathe, recover and come down off the previous high point. If everything is high energy with no release or no break, then it goes from arousal to exhaustion to numbness. The moments of peace and calm give opportunities for recouperation but also serve to highlight those moments of high arousal and energy, to make them more significant by the contrast. It’s the buildup of tension followed by the release, followed by the recovery. The laugh after a scary scene in a movie, followed by another scare that’s all the more frightening because of that moment of calm and release of tension. Or a laugh that hits harder because it comes seemingly out of nowhere during a dramatic or serious moment. Or someone suddenly contrasting their previous staid or even dowdy persona by turning on the charm and sex appeal. The times when the energy is low make the difference that much more noticeable and much more significant.
Now having talked about what leads to that misunderstanding, let’s take a moment to look at why this misunderstanding is a problem – why the feeling that you need to be “perfect” actually works against your goals. Trying to be perfect will sabotage your progress and any relationship that you will have because of it, simply because you will never actually feel secure and confident in that relationship.
Think about it. Being “perfect” by its very nature is impossible. But if “perfection” is the benchmark that you need to reach, then there’s no point where you are ever going to feel that you’re there – certainly not consistently. You may have times where you feel like you’ve absolutely nailed it – where you’ve done things “perfectly” – and that’s lead to that date or series of dates. But nobody can keep that level of “perfection” up forever. Everyone makes mistakes, everyone falls short of heaven, it’s part of the human experience. And because you feel that your value isn’t inherent but because of being able to perform perfection, then you can never feel like your connection with your partner is actually solid and secure. You will always living with the Sword of Damocles over your head, convinced that at some point you’ll either mess up or she’ll realize you’re not this impossible ideal and then it will all come crashing down.
This is why having that sense of your own value and worth is important. If you’re not secure in yourself and believe that you are enough – even if you aren’t perfect – you never feel like you can let your guard down and relax. Your value isn’t inherent, it’s in your performance and if your performance falters even a little then it’s all over.
And the seeking of perfection, of being The Best of the Best is ultimately about trying to allay that insecurity. It’s trying to drown out the fear of not being enough by piling it under accomplishments and metaphorical trophies. But none of it will ever be enough. As with external vs. internal validation, your chief sense of worth really needs to come from within, not from without.
And it’s not even necessary. Like you said: you like who you are now and what you’ve accomplished. That’s far more important and forms a much stronger foundation for a relationship. So take that feeling and let it be what motivates you. “I’m pretty damn cool; the right people will get that and the rest aren’t important” is a lot more attractive than “If I’m not at Peak Performance at all times, I’m worthless.”
So remind yourself that the need for perfection is unnecessary and unimportant. You’re pretty darn happy as you are and that’s more than enough.
Good luck.Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Please send your questions to Dr. NerdLove at his website (www.doctornerdlove.com/contact); or to his email, doc@doctornerdlove.com