Tony Ramirez approached me 15 years ago at a journalism job fair after he had taken a buyout at The New York Times.
Advertisement
He had a blue-chip resume: He had also worked at the Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal and Fortune magazine. He asked if the St. Louis Post-Dispatch was hiring, and I offered to pass along his resume.
At the time, I couldn’t fathom why he would consider moving to St. Louis. Now, I better understand the realities of job hunting in one’s 50s.
That was the only time we ever met in person. But that single interaction led to a friendship unlike any other I’ve had.
Tony was born in Manila and came to the United States as a young child for medical treatment for polio. He ended up studying at the University of California, Berkeley, focusing on political science and history, along with some Greek and Latin.
He was one of those people who had read, and seemingly understood, every important book. He was chronically online, and consumed all the news he could.
He sent me a couple of emails to follow up about a job at the Post-Dispatch. He would also email me in response to things I had tweeted, which struck me as odd. A mutual friend assured me that Tony was a strange bird, but harmless, kind and whip-smart.
We connected on Facebook, as well, keeping in touch through Tony's next couple of moves: a brief stint at the Las Vegas Review Journal, and then to Arizona to take care of his mom.
In the years when I did much of my work in the wee hours when most people were sleeping, Tony was usually awake. If I needed a quick edit on an essay, he was happy to do it. If I needed to rant about politics, he was there to commiserate. Back before our news site had a strict paywall, he would read my columns and offer edits after they had run.
He was direct -- and sometimes brusque -- in his comments. He was also witty and compassionate.
His Facebook feed was a firehose of information about politics, news and movies. He never shared stuff about his personal life with me, nor did he ask any personal questions. The closest he ever came to complimenting my writing was when I would discover he had shared one of my columns on his feed.
That he considered something I had written worthy of sharing was compliment enough.
In the olden days, I suppose we would have considered one another pen pals. But in this modern, digital age, we didn’t have to wait on letters or pen one-sided monologues. There was no small talk in our voluminous correspondence. Imagine having a brilliant and informed friend with whom you could discuss politics, art, writing, sports and more -- someone who shared your values and interests, yet never made a single demand on your time or attention. He sent a lot of messages to many friends, but I don’t think he ever expected a reply.
In an age when technology frequently divides and isolates us, it brought Tony and me together. There are limits to an online friendship, but there can also be a depth missing in casual face-to-face encounters.
In recent years, as my children got older and busier and I felt more settled in my career, Tony and I corresponded less frequently. We still occasionally commented on each other’s social media posts, and I read the mass messages he sent to a large group of people.
On Nov. 17, police found Tony dead in his home. He was 71. One of his best friends and a neighbor had called the police for a welfare check when he had been unusually quiet. Police said he likely died of a medical incident.
I found out several days later through an email from the journalism organization we both belonged to -- the same one that hosted the job fair where we'd met years ago. The group included a tribute to Tony in its weekly newsletter.
I wonder if he knew how much I valued his correspondence and friendship.
I hope he did.
When I told my son about Tony, and about his death, I said that I didn’t have another friendship quite like that one.
“You probably never will,” he said. The truth of that comment hit me.
I didn’t realize how rare it was until it was gone.